Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these types of systems. Coming from lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilised in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to find their way these devices and to follow their right for security.

It also displays how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from opening the programs of cover. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: when they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Comment

O seu endereço de email não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios marcados com *

Scroll to Top